MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414340489 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.17.676934

Potent broad-spectrum anti-coronaviral frameshift inhibitors from virtual screen of RNA binding

2025· preprint· en· W4414340489 on OpenAlexaff
Krishna Neupane, Rohith Vedhthaanth Sekar, Sandaru M. Ileperuma, Eileen Reklow, Sneha Munshi, Sara Ibrahim Omar, Sahar Arbabimoghadam, J. E. Peterson, Jack A. Tuszyński, Tom C. Hobman, Michael T. Woodside

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranslational frameshiftFrameshift mutationLimitingRNAPseudoknotViral replicationCellRibosomeBinding site

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronavirus genomes contain an RNA pseudoknot that directs −1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) to control expression of viral proteins crucial for replication. Ligands that inhibit −1 PRF can thus attenuate viral propagation and have potential as drugs for limiting coronavirus infections. To search for novel small-molecule frameshift inhibitors with anticoronaviral activity, we computationally screened over 14 million compounds for binding to the SARS-CoV-2 pseudoknot, followed by experimental validation of the top hits for inhibition of −1 PRF and viral replication. We identified multiple potent −1 PRF inhibitors, effective at nM concentrations, some of which significantly suppressed SARS-CoV-2 replication in cell culture. Several compounds also inhibited −1 PRF in multiple representative bat coronaviruses, indicating broad-spectrum activity. These results showcase the promise of viral RNA structures like frameshift-stimulatory pseudoknots as targets for broad-spectrum antiviral drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicComputational Drug Discovery Methods→French-language works237,207→