MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414343342 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70437

Allogenic MSCs are a safe and efficacious treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

2025· review· en· W4414343342 on OpenAlex
Randy Y. J. Loke, Zachary Chu, Jonathan Liang, Don Thong Siang Koh, Junwei Soong, KH Lee, Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryClinical trialRandomized controlled trialMesenchymal stem cellMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is a potential non‐surgical option for cartilage repair. Currently, its clinical use largely focuses on focal cartilage defect repair and intra‐articular injections in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Most studies have looked at the efficacy of MSCs from autologous sources, which can be limited by inter‐patient variability of age, diseases, sites and methods of harvest. This systematic review aims to evaluate studies that focus on allogeneic MSCs implantation versus placebo in patients with knee OA to summarise the efficacy and safety of allogeneic MSCs in knee OA. Methods A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was performed in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE. Original studies investigating the outcomes of allogeneic MSC implantations in patients with knee OA were included. Data on clinical outcomes, such as subjective scores such as VAS and WOMAC, radiological outcomes, such as cartilage thickness, and histological outcomes, such as ICRSII score, were extracted. Results Seven studies were included in this review. There was 30.4 points improvement in Visual Analogue Scale scores and 40.0 points of improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores at 12 months. Improved cartilage thickness and decreased poor cartilage quality as measured by T2 relaxation. Measurements at the lesion site were observed in three studies as assessed by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and this was correlated clinically. One study also showed histological improvement with overall ICRSII scores significantly improving from 32.0 ± 21.6 at baseline to 55.9 ± 23.2 at 6 months ( p < 0.05). No major complications or tumorigenesis occurred. Conclusion Allogeneic MSC implantation in patients with knee osteoarthritis provides sustained clinical improvement and satisfactory cartilage restoration, up to 12 months follow‐up. These results are supported by both imaging and histological studies. The safety profile of allogeneic MSCs is excellent, with minimal adverse events mainly limited to local reaction to injection and no long‐term adverse effects. Level of Evidence Level II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it