Predictors of functional disability in people with ischemic stroke: two to three years after the stroke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with functional disability in people with ischemic stroke (IS) between 2 and 3 years after the event. METHOD: Prospective cohort with 241 participants. Instruments for sociodemographic and clinical characterization, the Rankin-m Scale, and a telephone call protocol were used. Data were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square or Fisher's Exact tests and a robust Poisson model, with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Of the participants, 62.6% had a Rankin of 0 to 2. Multivariate analysis showed that greater neurological deficit (6-13 and ≥14) was 2.35 (95% CI 1.13;4.05) and 4.4 (95% CI 2.09;6.83) times more associated with moderate to severe disability; failure to perform thrombolysis and ischemic stroke recurrence were, respectively, 3.02 (95% CI: 1.32;3.74) and 3.82 times (95% CI: 1.49;3.47) more associated with moderate to severe disability. CONCLUSION: The event impacted functional capacity, with greater neurological deficit, non-performance of thrombolysis, and stroke recurrence as the main predictors of disability. Strategies such as expanded thrombolysis, early care, ongoing rehabilitation, and risk factor control can reduce disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it