MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414346415 · doi:10.3791/68837

A Multifunctional, Embedded-based, Bluetooth-enabled, Programmable, Biphasic-waveform Stimulator with Real-time Neural Signal Acquisition

2025· article· en· W4414346415 on OpenAlexaff
Philips Zachariah, Jijo Francis, Adarsh V. Parekkattil, S Athithya, Caren Babu, Loitongbam Surajkumar Singh, Shuma Adhikari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visualized Experiments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformNeuromodulationSIGNAL (programming language)Flexibility (engineering)Artificial neural networkSignal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study introduces a lightweight, Bluetooth-enabled deep brain stimulation (DBS) device that is designed specifically for preclinical research in small, freely moving animals. To address the current limitations in waveform flexibility and wireless control, we developed a compact, multifunctional stimulator capable of delivering programmable, charge-balanced biphasic waveforms while simultaneously acquiring neural signals. The system integrates off-the-shelf components for current regulation, signal amplification, and analog-to-digital conversion, all managed by a low-power microcontroller. The assembly includes key steps such as circuit integration on a double-sided 30 x 30 mm PCB, waveform programming via nRF Connect, and validation through saline and load resistance testing. In vitro assessments demonstrated reliable current output across varying load impedances, effective saline operation without waveform degradation, and high-fidelity neural signal recording with a signal-to-noise ratio exceeding 35 dB. These results confirm the device's suitability for closed-loop neuromodulation experiments and lay the groundwork for future translational studies in DBS therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visualized Experiments→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→