Estimating associations between cumulative exposure and health via generalized distributed lag non-linear models using penalized splines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantifying associations between short-term exposure to ambient air pollution and health outcomes is an important public health priority. Many studies have investigated the association considering delayed effects within the past few days. Adaptive cumulative exposure distributed lag non-linear models (ACE-DLNMs) quantify associations between health outcomes and cumulative exposure that is specified in a data-adaptive way. While the ACE-DLNM framework is highly interpretable, it is limited to continuous outcomes and does not scale well to large datasets. Motivated by a large analysis of daily pollution and respiratory hospitalization counts in Canada between 2001 and 2018, we propose a generalized ACE-DLNM incorporating penalized splines, improving upon existing ACE-DLNM methods to accommodate general response types. We then develop a computationally efficient estimation strategy based on profile likelihood and Laplace approximate marginal likelihood with Newton-type methods. We demonstrate the performance and practical advantages of the proposed method through simulations. In application to the motivating analysis, the proposed method yields more stable inferences compared to generalized additive models with fixed exposures, while retaining interpretability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".