MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414346965 · doi:10.1080/07350015.2025.2551244

Robust Conditional Kurtosis and the Cross-Section of International Stock Returns

2025· article· en· W4414346965 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruifeng Liu, Alex Maynard, Ilias Tsiakas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business and Economic Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsKurtosisStock (firearms)Robustness (evolution)Nonparametric statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce robust kurtosis, which is a new quantile-based measure for the kurtosis of stock returns. For approximately normal distributions, robust kurtosis is equivalent to the traditional moment-based kurtosis. For fat-tailed distributions, when kurtosis matters the most, robust kurtosis provides a distinct and reliable measure. Using a cross-section of international stock index returns, we find that robust kurtosis carries a significant negative premium: higher robust kurtosis is related to lower future stock returns. This contrasts with the positive premium associated with robust skewness identified in previous research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Business and Economic StatisticsSame topicFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFrench-language works237,207