MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414348312 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3612221

Energy-Efficient Multi-UAV Navigation for Cooperative Data Sensing and Transmission

2025· article· en· W4414348312 on OpenAlexaff
Hu He, Jun Peng, Lin Cai, Weirong Liu, Chenglong Wang, Xin Gu, Zhiwu Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Data transmissionSignal processingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) hold significant potential for sensing services in a large scope of area, thanks to their wide coverage and adaptable deployment. Considering the complex environment dynamics and limited sensing range, navigating multiple UAVs in a distributed way becomes challenging to implement cooperative data sensing and transmission tasks. In this paper, we optimize the trajectory design of UAVs by jointly considering the collected data volume, geographical fairness and limited energy reserve during their service period. To achieve the long-term serving objective, a memory augmented multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach is presented to ensure energy-efficient distributed trajectory design with partial observations. Specifically, the intrinsic criterion is developed to enhance UAV spatial exploration when reaching the boundary of explored regions. Then, to address the information loss caused by incomplete observations, the spatial-temporal memory augmented actor-critic architecture is designed to extract historical contextual features for multi-UAV cooperative navigation. Furthermore, the prioritized experience replay mechanism is incorporated to enhance important experience exploitation for UAV collaboration. Extensive simulations using two real-world datasets in Shenzhen and Beijing demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of data collection ratio, geographical fairness, and energy consumption ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207