MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414349678 · doi:10.3390/plants14182920

Morphological and Transcriptomic Analyses Provide New Insights into Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) Seedling Roots Response to Nitrogen Stress

2025· article· en· W4414349678 on OpenAlexaff
Braulio J. Soto‐Cerda, Giovanni Larama, Bourlaye Fofana, Izsavo Soto

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
KeywordsSeedlingShootDry weightTranscriptomeWRKY protein domainNitrogenCultivarGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen (N) is the most important macro-nutrient for plant growth and development, which not only results in the highest cost in crop production but may also lead to environmental pollution. Hence, there is a need to develop N and use efficient genotypes, a prerequisite for which is a better understanding of N stress adaptation. Here, responses of two contrasting linseed accessions at the seedling stage were assessed for N stress-induced changes in twelve phenotypic traits and for gene expression profiling in the roots. The results showed that nine out of twelve phenotypic traits were affected under N stress conditions, and include total root length (TRL), root tips (RT), shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), root-to-shoot ratio (R/S), plant nitrogen content (PNC), shoot nitrogen content (SNC), root nitrogen content (RNC), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). For example, under N stress, the TRL, RDW, SDW, PNC, SNC, and RNC showed reductions of 7.1, 7.6, 16.0, 43.7, 43.3, and 38.7%, respectively. The N-efficient (NE) genotype outperformed the N-inefficient (NI) genotype for all root and shoot traits and NUE under N stress and N normal conditions. Transcriptome analysis identified 1034 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under the contrasting N conditions and uncovered the opposite responses of the two linseed genotypes to N starvation at the gene expression level. DEGs included 153 transcription factors distributed in 27 families, among which ERF, MYB, NAC, and WRKY were the most represented. In addition, DEGs involved in N absorption and transport, root development, amino acid transport, and antioxidant activity were found to be differentially expressed. The candidate genes identified in the current study are purported for their roles in N metabolism in other crops and might also play a pivotal role in N stress adaptation in linseed, and therefore could be useful for further detailed research on N stress response in linseed, paving the way toward developing N-efficient linseed cultivars with improved root system architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207