Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and firm value in Vietnam, with a specific focus on the moderating role of profitability. Using a panel dataset of publicly listed Vietnamese companies between 2014 and 2023, the study applies the Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) method to address potential heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation issues. The findings indicate that ESG engagement has a generally positive impact on firm value, measured by Tobin’s Q.; however, this effect varies significantly across firms depending on their profitability levels. Firms with higher profitability benefit more from ESG practices, while those with low profitability experience weaker or neutral effects. This suggests that financial health plays a critical role in shaping the outcomes of ESG adoptions. This study contributes to the growing ESG literature in emerging markets by highlighting how internal financial capacity affects the effectiveness of sustainability strategies. It also provides practical implications for managers and policymakers seeking to align ESG initiatives with value-creation goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it