Images diasporiques et identités multiples dans l’œuvre de Lido Pimienta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’image de sa pop expérimentale, fusionnant musique électronique, instrumentation analogique et rythmes afro-colombiens, le tout chanté en espagnol, l’artiste colombo-canadienne Lido Pimienta a créé un univers visuel unique et foisonnant. Son approche, à la fois poétique et ludique, cherche à déconstruire les représentations conventionnelles des femmes latino-américaines dans l’industrie musicale contemporaine. À travers ses clips vidéo, ses pochettes d’album et ses photos promotionnelles, elle déploie diverses stratégies pour aborder de manière originale des thématiques telles que l’identité diasporique, la maternité et le féminisme. En mobilisant les études de genre et les études culturelles, cet article analyse la production visuelle de l’artiste afin de saisir la manière dont elle construit une représentation complexe et revendicative de ses identités multiples, tout en célébrant la pluralité des corps et des expériences féminines, ainsi que l’ambivalence de l’expérience diasporique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".