Accelerating Adversarial Training on Under-Utilized GPU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks and adversarial training has been proposed to defend against such attacks by adaptively generating attacks, i.e., adversarial examples, during training. However, adversarial training is significantly slower than traditional training due to the search for worst attacks for each minibatch. To speed up adversarial training, existing work has considered a subset of a minibatch for generating attacks and reduced the steps in the search for attacks. We propose a novel adversarial training acceleration method, called AttackRider, by exploring under-utilized GPU hardware to reduce the number of calls to attack generation without increasing the time of each call. We characterize the extent of under-utilization of GPU for given GPU and model size, hence the potential for speedup, and present the application scenarios where this opportunity exists. The results on various machine learning tasks and datasets show that AttackRider can speed up state-of-the-art adversarial training algorithms with comparable robust accuracy. The source code of AttackRider is available at https://github.com/zxzhan/AttackRider.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".