A review on real-time waste tracking and route optimization using cloud-based IoT systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing need for green urbanization has surfaced the inefficiencies of conventional waste collection infrastructure. Proposes a smart waste collection system based on IoT sensors and TOPSIS multi-criteria decision support method for route optimization with criteria such as toxicity, volume, and time duration. With multiple influencing variables compared to using one parameter, the system proposed here achieved a reduction of 14% in the overall collection distance. Likewise, it deals with the application of IoT for real-time medical waste monitoring in smart cities. It suggests an Android-based route navigation and real-time bin statistics-supported Medical Waste Collection Management (MWCM) system for ensuring waste collection truck routing. It is designed to minimize labor, cost, and environmental footprints while facilitating sustainable development goals. Drawing upon the past trend of embedding cutting-edge technologies in urban waste management, we investigate the use of Industry 4.0 and cyberphysical systems for the collection of residential waste in downtown Toronto. A mathematical model is formulated to solve routing, scheduling, and assignment problems, with optimization objectives aimed at cost-effectiveness, environmental sustainability, and public health factors. The model is tested using a binary bat algorithm and scenario analysis and has been shown to be effective in improving operational sustainability and reliability. Combined, all Papers offer varied but complementary solutions to smart waste management, highlighting the importance of IoT, decision algorithms, and smart planning in the transformation of municipal services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".