MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414366923 · doi:10.55914/hti.2.1.004

Messages to Ancestors: Following the Notes from Africville to Emancipation to the Door of No Return

2025· article· en· W4414366923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cyrus Sundar Singh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmancipationBlessingAfrican descentCulminationEthnic groupFalling (accident)Carry (investment)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Canadian Thanksgiving in October 2023, I stood on the shores of Gorée Island, next to the Door of No Return, off the west coast of Dakar, Senegal. Facing westward across the Atlantic Ocean and with the help of Fallou Bal, our Senegalese guide, I bent down and set fire to a collection of Messages to Ancestors, handwritten on paper by various Canadians of African Descent from Africville, Nova Scotia, to Emancipation, Ontario, and many others in between. The smoke ascended into the African skies. Entrusted to carry their messages, I fulfilled my role as the messenger and documented the burning. My presence on African soil was the culmination of a decade of relationships that began with the Canadian communities of Africville and Emancipation at the start of my academic journey, which fortuitously also aligned with the Decade for People of African Descent (2015–2024). As such, the opportunity to carry their messages back to Africa was a blessing and an auspicious gift. The paper chronicles this journey following the notes from Africville to Emancipation to the Door of No Return.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0410.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207