AI-Based Algorithm to Detect Heart and Lung Disease From Acute Chest Computed Tomography Scans: Protocol for an Algorithm Development and Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a common cause of hospitalization, posing diagnostic challenges among older adult patients with multimorbid conditions. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans are increasingly used in patients with dyspnea and offer superior diagnostic accuracy over chest radiographs but face limited use due to a shortage of radiologists. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and validate artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to enable automatic analysis of acute CT scans and provide immediate feedback on the likelihood of pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and cardiac decompensation. This protocol will focus on cardiac decompensation. METHODS: We designed a retrospective method development and validation study. This study has been approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (1575037). We extracted 4672 acute chest CT scans with corresponding radiological reports from the Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark, from 2016 to 2021. The scans will be randomly split into training (2/3) and internal validation (1/3) sets. Development of the AI algorithm involves parameter tuning and feature selection using cross validation. Internal validation uses radiological reports as the ground truth, with algorithm-specific thresholds based on true positive and negative rates of 90% or greater for heart and lung diseases. The AI models will be validated in low-dose chest CT scans from consecutive patients admitted with acute dyspnea and in coronary CT angiography scans from patients with acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: As of August 2025, CT data extraction has been completed. Algorithm development, including image segmentation and natural language processing, is ongoing. However, for pulmonary congestion, the algorithm development has been completed. Internal and external validation are planned, with overall validation expected to conclude in 2025 and the final results to be available in 2026. CONCLUSIONS: The results are expected to enhance clinical decision-making by providing immediate, AI-driven insights from CT scans, which will be beneficial for both clinicians and patients. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77030.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".