MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414374699 · doi:10.53759/7669/jmc202505209

A Smart Shopping System for Modern E-Commerce Applications

2025· article· en· W4414374699 on OpenAlexaff
P. Jyothi, Divya Kumari Tankala, Rajesh Kumar A, Nagarjuna Reddy S, Nagendar Yamsani, Jyotsna Devi Kosuru S N V

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Machine and Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)Convergence (economics)Quality (philosophy)Adversarial systemKey (lock)Optimization problemPurchasingScale (ratio)Noise (video)Variation (astronomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a modern E-commerce system, exact and efficient classification of products is one of the major challenge. The user experience of online purchasing is heavily relies on product classification accuracy as well as. Given the large number of products and viable categories, have developing a new framework automatically for assigning the products to suitable categories at scale is desirable. However, inadequate item descriptions, poor data quality and adversarial noise in training data, can lead to low prediction accuracy when applying the Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. In addition, the various influx of new products uploaded daily and the dynamic nature of categories highlight the need for novel intelligent classification models that can control the cost and time required by human editors. To overcome these kind of issues, Squirrel search War Strategy Optimization (SSWSO)_LeNet replica is introduced. SSWSO is a revolutionary nature-inspired optimization algorithm developed for unconstrained optimization issues. The foraging behavior of southern flying squirrels is examined and quantitatively simulated, considering every aspect of their food hunt to achieve the desired optimum. Squirrel search Algorithm (SSA) provides global optimum solutions with excellent convergence behavior. Meanwhile, War Strategy Optimization (WSA) algorithm includes an adaptive weight mechanism that varies from one solution (soldier) to another and is updated weights depends on the soldier's rank during the update phase. Thus, the combined optimization strategies ensure an efficient balance among the exploration and exploitation stages. By integrating WSO and SSA provides better product classification accuracy and superior performance. Furthermore, the experimental findings showed that the SSWSO_LeNet performed better in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with values of 0.976, 0.877, and 0.857, which is impressive compared to state-of-the-art results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Machine and ComputingSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207