MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414374785 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.013

Revisions to geological unit names in New Brunswick, Canada, to address culturally offensive or inappropriate nomenclature

2025· article· en· W4414374785 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dustin R.L. Dahn, Erin A. Smith, Philippe Pagé

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffensiveNomenclatureUnit (ring theory)Identification (biology)Toponymy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent amendments to the North American Stratigraphic Code enable the renaming of offensive or inappropriate unit names. Although the Province of New Brunswick has commenced the identification and renaming of culturally inappropriate geographic features, the use of offensive toponyms presents a problem in the naming of geological units. Names of eight geological units and structures in New Brunswick are culturally inappropriate or offensive. Following the guidelines in the amended Stratigraphic Code, replacement names for these problematic units and structures are proposed herein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207