MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414374792 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2025.012

Not the Neo-Acadian orogeny: distinguishing Quaboagian deformation in New England from events in Atlantic Canada

2025· article· en· W4414374792 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John W.F. Waldron, Sandra M. Barr, Chris E. White, Deanne van Rooyen

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTerraneOrogenyDevonianAccretion (finance)TectonicsSinistral and dextralPaleozoicCrust

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tectonic evolution of the northern Appalachian orogen is typically organized into orogenic episodes. The Taconian orogeny includes latest Cambrian to Late Ordovician arc-continent collision. Subsequent polarity reversal led to Silurian accretion of Ganderian terranes during Salinian orogenesis. The Acadian orogeny comprises Pridoli to Middle Devonian deformation attributed to accretion of West Avalonia to Laurentia. The term Neo-Acadian was coined by Robinson for Late Devonian to Mississippian shortening in New England, ca. 370–350 Ma, but the Indigenous-derived name Quaboagian was subsequently favoured for this episode. The “Neoacadian” later became associated with Meguma terrane docking, but clear convergent deformation in the Meguma terrane falls outside the original Neo-Acadian interval. Folding of strata in the Meguma terrane from ca. 409 Ma, concurrent with Acadian deformation, occurred in a different tectonic environment; emplacement of subduction-related plutons followed at mainly ca. 379–372 Ma. The ca. 370–350 Ma interval saw uplift of the Meguma terrane, local plutonism, and deposition of the Horton Group in a basin-and-range setting, whereas the crust beneath the Gulf of St. Lawrence thinned to less than half normal thickness during Maritimes basin development. These anorogenic transtensional basins were probably connected with Quaboagian shortening in New England via dextral strike-slip. Shortening and inversion resumed after ca. 330 Ma, associated with dextral transpression, docking the Meguma terrane close its present-day position. The misuse of "Neoacadian orogeny" leads to misconceptions about its timing of accretion and about ca. 370–350 Ma tectonics in Atlantic Canada, which involved extension not shortening. We recommend the term be abandoned in favour of Quaboagian and restricted to convergence in New England. Earlier deformation in the Meguma terrane may be attributed to the Kejimkujic orogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207