MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414376833 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1574

GRB 241105A: a test case for GRB classification and rapid <i>r</i> -process nucleosynthesis channels

2025· article· en· W4414376833 on OpenAlexafffund
Dimple Dimple, B. P. Gompertz, A. J. Levan, D. Malesani, T Laskar, Suman Bala, A A Chrimes, K. E. Heintz, L. Izzo, Gavin P. Lamb, Desmond O’Neill, J. T. Palmerio, A. Saccardi, G. E. Anderson, Yuxiang Huang, Amit Kumar, L. Li, S. McBreen, Oindabi Mukherjee, S. R. Oates, Utkarsh Pathak, Yongqiang Qiu, O. J. Roberts, R. B. Sonawane, P. Vereš, K. Ackley, Xiaohong Han, Y Julakanti, Jin Wang, P. D’Avanzo, A. Martín-Carrillo, M. E. Ravasio, A. Rossi, N. R. Tanvir, J. P. Anderson, M. Arabsalmani, S. Belkin, R. P. Breton, R. Brivio, Eric Burns, J. Casares, S. Campana, S. I. Chastain, V. D’Elia, V. S. Dhillon, M. Dyer, J. P. U. Fynbo, D. K. Galloway, B. Godson, A J Goodwin, M. Gromadzki, D. H. Hartmann, P. Jakobsson, T. Killestein, R. Kotak, James K. Leung, J. Lyman, A. Melandri, S. Mattila, Sean McGee, Christopher P. Morley, Tapan K. Mukherjee, T. E. Müller-Bravo, K. Noysena, P O’Brien, M. De Pasquale, G. Pignata, D. Pollacco, G. Pugliese, Gavin Ramsay, A. Sahu, R Salvaterra, P. Schady, Benjamin Schneider, D. Steeghs, R. L. C. Starling, K. Tsalapatas, K. Ulaczyk, A. J. van der Horst, C. Wang, K. Wiersema, I. Worssam, Makenzie E. Wortley, S. L. Xiong, Tayyaba Zafar

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsMarshall Space Flight CenterH2020 European Research CouncilTurun YliopistoCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNuclear Safety and Security CommissionLeverhulme TrustMonash UniversityEuropean CommissionNational Astronomical Research Institute of ThailandUniversity of WarwickUniversity of LeicesterUK Research and InnovationHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversity of PortsmouthEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGamma-ray burstRedshiftSupernovaAfterglowNeutron starBinary numberGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) offer a powerful window to probe the progenitor systems responsible for the formation of heavy elements through the rapid neutron capture (r-) process, thanks to their exceptional luminosity, which allows them to be observed across vast cosmic distances. GRB 241105A, observed at a redshift of $z = 2.681$, features a short initial spike ($\sim$1.5 s) and a prolonged weak emission lasting about 64 s, positioning it as a candidate for a compact binary merger and potentially marking it as the most distant merger-driven GRB observed to date. However, the emerging ambiguity in GRB classification necessitates further investigation into the burst’s true nature. Prompt emission analyses, such as hardness ratio, spectral lag, and minimum variability time-scales, yield mixed classifications, while machine-learning-based clustering places GRB 241105A near both long-duration mergers and collapsar GRBs. We conducted observations using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to search for a potential supernova counterpart. Although no conclusive evidence was found for a supernova, the host galaxy’s properties derived from the JWST observations suggest active star formation with low metallicity, and a sub-kpc offset of the afterglow from the host, which appears broadly consistent with a collapsar origin. Nevertheless, a compact binary merger origin cannot be ruled out, as the burst may plausibly arise from a fast progenitor channel. This would have important implications for heavy element enrichment in the early Universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→