MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414380471 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2025.102643

Drivers and implications of lineage-specific cancer-related mutations in human pluripotent and adult stem cells

2025· article· en· W4414380471 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jonathan Jung, Nissim Benvenisty

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science FoundationRosetrees TrustEuropean Commission
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellStem cellTranscriptomeMesenchymal stem cellGeneMutationInduced stem cellsAdult stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are known to harbor mutations in tumor-associated genes, and here we aim to examine the status of adult stem cells (ASCs). We thus identify cancer-related mutations in 18% of about 600 mesenchymal stem cell samples, and in 41% of about 200 neural stem cell (NSC) samples. We show a lineage-specific profile of cancer-related genes, demonstrating that TP53 is a central mutated gene in human PSCs but not in mesenchymal or NSCs. We suggest that the lineage-specificity of tumor-associated genes correlates with their expression levels and with tumor-specific mutations in patients. We also show the consequences of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes on the transcriptome of each specific stem cell lineage. We therefore propose a categorization of these mutated samples for further appreciation of their severity and emphasize the importance of genetic screening in pluripotent and ASC lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207