MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414381315 · doi:10.1177/29768640251377168

Post-smart cities as digital authoritarian polities: The aesthetic politics of the Praxis Network State

2025· article· en· W4414381315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogues on Digital Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsSGS (Canada)University of Ottawa
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPraxisAuthoritarianismRhetoricPoliticsState (computer science)Order (exchange)PosthumanPosthumanismGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With proliferating proposals for blockchain, cryptocurrency or AI-driven post-smart cities, this short piece focuses on the Praxis Network State (PNS). The PNS presents a coherent but dangerous rationale for such post-smart urbanism: a vision of a planet and people in crisis that is to be survived and ultimately abandoned in order to catalyze a posthuman future in the stars. It argues that an examination of its aesthetic politics and rhetoric can help us identify the outlines of this urban version of digital authoritarianism, in order to resist and ultimately overturn it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it