Entre la deferencia y el poder: estudio de actos directivos en correspondencia privada del español clásico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente estudio analiza la evolución de los mecanismos pragmalingüísticos utilizados para formular actos de habla directivos en el español de los siglos xvi y xvii, centrándose en un género discursivo en particular: la correspondencia privada. A través de un corpus especializado de 300 cartas, se han examinado 1378 muestras de actos directivos, destacando la prevalencia de construcciones directas como los enunciados imperativos y las expresiones realizativas. Los resultados obtenidos confirman que la cortesía en esta época se sustentaba en la noción de jerarquía social y, desde el punto de vista lingüístico, dependía de la combinación de los mecanismos pragmalingüísticos con las formas de tratamiento. Así, la presencia o ausencia de estas últimas constituía uno de los ejes centrales de la cortesía clásica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".