MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414397708 · doi:10.47339/ephj.2023.250

A Comparison of Pre and Post COVID-19 Pandemic Pest Related Violations in Restaurants within the Fraser Health Authority

2024· article· en· W4414397708 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elena Lazovski, Amardeep Kambo

Bibliographic record

VenueBCIT Environmental Public Health Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Safety and Hygiene
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSanitationPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Service (business)Integrated pest managementFood safety2019-20 coronavirus outbreakAnimal health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the food service sector, particularly in-person dining at restaurants and bars, leading to a decrease in regular inspections by Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) in British Columbia. As restrictions on indoor dining ease, it is essential to ensure that food is being prepared and handled in a safe and sanitary manner. However, neglecting pest management and sanitation practices in restaurants can lead to food-borne illnesses. The research project investigated whether there had been an increase in the number and severity of pest-related violations in the Fraser Health Authority (FHA) following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBCIT Environmental Public Health JournalSame topicFood Safety and HygieneFrench-language works237,207