MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Coherent Fiber-Optic Method for Spatially-Resolved, Time-Dependent, Picometer-Scale Displacement Amplitude Measurements of Surface Acoustic Waves

2025· article· en· W4414401534 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christina Anna Louka, Gerard Tatel, Da-Peng Zhou, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAmplitudeSurface acoustic waveDisplacement (psychology)FootprintSurface acoustic wave sensorAcoustic waveSurface (topology)Surface wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface acoustic wave (SAW) devices are widely used in communications, sensing and quantum systems due to their small footprint and high sensitivity. Better understanding of SAW propagation theory and loss mechanisms could benefit device design for highly efficient SAW sensors. Here, we propose a technique for absoluteamplitude measurements of vertical SAW displacement, using a fiber point-sensor through optical-acoustic wave interaction. This is achieved by a curved Fabry-Pérot interferometer formed by a single-mode fiber endface and the curved SAW surface. A theoretical model is implemented to relate the sensor response to SAW amplitude and to eliminate the need for focusing lenses, all while maintaining high spatial resolution. The 4x larger SAW wavelength compared to the fiber endface dimension and the high optical sampling speed, ensure coherent optical and acoustic wave interaction. Results show amplitudes on the order of a few picometers for a lithium niobate-based SAW at 100 MHz, consistent with theoretical expectations and experimental validation. Through scanning the sensor in the horizontal direction, we can image the quasi-standing waves formed in the SAW cavity. The proposed setup is simpler, more compact, non-contact, applicable to more substrate materials compared to previous approaches, and can provide insights to improve SAW device design to enhance performance. It opens a new door for applications such as material surface defect detection, bio-sample concentration sensing, or coherent coupling to quantum systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors→French-language works237,207→