MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414401696 · doi:10.31004/prepotif.v9i2.48356

P3A0 DENGAN RETENSIO PLASENTA

2025· article· id· W4414401696 on OpenAlexaff
Naufal Ikbar Rian Adnan, Freddy Dinata

Bibliographic record

VenuePREPOTIF Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyReproductive medicineMEDLINEUterine bleeding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retensio plasenta merupakan salah satu penyebab utama perdarahan postpartum yang dapat berujung pada syok hipovolemik dan kematian maternal apabila tidak segera ditangani secara tepat. Kami melaporkan kasus seorang wanita berusia 36 tahun, P3A0, yang dirujuk ke Instalasi Gawat Darurat RSUD Ciawi dari praktik bidan. Pasien menjalani persalinan spontan pada usia kehamilan 41 minggu di fasilitas bidan, namun dua jam pascapersalinan mengalami perdarahan hebat dengan plasenta yang belum lahir. Pemeriksaan fisik menunjukkan konjungtiva anemis, tekanan darah 100/70 mmHg, dan frekuensi nadi 100 kali per menit. Pemeriksaan penunjang menunjukkan kadar hemoglobin sebesar 8,5 g/dL serta hasil ultrasonografi yang mengidentifikasi adanya sisa plasenta dalam kavum uteri. Pasien tidak memiliki riwayat operasi sesar sebelumnya. Tindakan segera dilakukan untuk menghentikan perdarahan dan mengevakuasi jaringan plasenta yang tersisa. Kasus ini menekankan pentingnya deteksi dini dan penanganan cepat pada retensio plasenta guna mencegah komplikasi lanjut yang berpotensi fatal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePREPOTIF Jurnal Kesehatan MasyarakatSame topicDecision Support System ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207