Spatial statistics for identifying and scoring immune clusters in high-plex profiles of primary prostate cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The spatial arrangement of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) varies widely, from dispersed to clustered and tumor excluded to infiltrating. Multiplexed spatial profiling is an effective means of characterizing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and immune complexes such as tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in the TME. However, few approaches have been described for objectively parametrizing patterns of immune organization and assessing their association with biological or clinical variables. This makes it difficult to evaluate whether a set of tumors is relatively immunologically cold or hot. Here we describe an intuitive set of statistical tools (available in the R package, tlsR ) for characterizing lymphocyte patterns in the TME of solid cancers. We apply tlsR to primary prostate cancer (PCa), which is often described as immunologically ‘cold’. Using a cohort of 29 radical prostatectomy specimens stratified into low Gleason-grade (LGG; n=15) and high Gleason-grades (HGG; n =14) we show that HGG PCa is significantly more infiltrated than LGG PCa with lymphocytes organized into B cell or T cell enriched immune clusters (BICs and TICs). A subset of these ICs have the B and T cell zonation and follicular dendritic cells characteristic of a bona fide TLS. HGGs are also enriched with ICs containing precursor exhausted T cells (T pex ) and proliferating B cells and their tumor compartments harbor granzyme-B + cytotoxic T cells in contact with cancer cells. Thus, far from being cold, a subset of HGG PCa has features associated with active immune surveillance, a finding with implications for emerging PCa immunotherapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".