Lightweight Certificateless Authentication Scheme With Enhanced Privacy for CAVs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) represent a transformative advancement in transportation, offering enhanced safety, improved traffic efficiency, and reduced environmental impact through intelligent driving. As CAVs operate without human intervention, they heavily rely on secure vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication for cooperative perception and coordinated decision-making. These real-time inter-vehicle exchanges underpin safe coordination, dynamic decision-making, and collision avoidance. To ensure trust in such communication, robust and efficient authentication mechanisms are essential. However, existing schemes often fall short in terms of security resilience and operational practicality. In this paper, we propose a novel Certificateless Signature Scheme with Conditional Privacy-Preserving Authentication (CLSS-CPPA) tailored to CAV environments. The proposed scheme addresses three fundamental limitations in existing schemes: signature forgery vulnerabilities, single-authority dependency, and lack of dynamic revocation capability. Our approach employs distributed key generation to prevent signature forgery attacks, utilizes prefix tree structures for efficient dynamic key revocation, and implements dual-agency pseudonym management with mutual authority constraints to prevent single-entity power abuse. Lightweight cryptographic operations are also adopted to suit resource-constrained vehicular systems. Formal security analysis and extensive evaluations demonstrate that CLSS-CPPA enhances privacy preserving and reduces signing and verifying costs by 20%–90% compared to state-of-the-art schemes, making it a promising solution for real-world CAV deployments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".