MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Adaptive Semantic Communication Scheme Using a Semantic Mask Module

2025· article· en· W4414405376 on OpenAlexaff
Oladayo Ogunjimi, Fangzhe Chen, Fang Fang, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckChannel (broadcasting)Information bottleneck methodTask (project management)Scheme (mathematics)Representation (politics)Data transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By extracting and transmitting semantic information (SI), semantic communications (SC) can achieve communication goal and reliable transmission with much lower data rate among devices. However, devices in SC typically need to perform concurrent tasks, subject to varying available computational resources. Additionally, dynamic communication environments could dramatically deteriorate communication performance. To achieve robust SC with aforementioned uncertainties, this paper proposes a context-aware, adaptive rate, multitask SC scheme (CAAR-MTSC) to optimize the latent representation of transmitted data. The proposed scheme comprehensively considers the user’s perceptual needs, current channel conditions, and task-relevant information within the data. Specifically, we introduce a Semantic Mask Module (SMM) that dynamically controls the data rate based on channel conditions and user-defined perceptual metrics to obtain the best trade-off between task performance and data rate. To enhance multi-task performance, we formulate a triple trade-off information bottleneck (IB) optimization problem using rate-distortion perception. We further incorporate a knowledge distillation (KD) strategy to reduce the model size while maintaining performance. Simulation results indicate that, in low-SNR conditions, the proposed framework achieves up to a 12% improvement in SSIM and a 3.4% increase in classification accuracy while reducing data rate by 11%, thereby demonstrating its efficacy under resource-constrained scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Automated SystemsFrench-language works237,207