MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Computationally Efficient Indoor Positioning Using the 3D-MUSIC Algorithm

2025· article· en· W4414405632 on OpenAlexaff
Payam Pourzadeh Hassan, Ian Marsland, Roland Smith, Hazem Ibrahim, E.V.H. Iun, Ioannis Lambadaris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnapshot (computer storage)Robustness (evolution)SmoothingGridCovarianceTime synchronizationSynchronization (alternating current)Transmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a low-complexity solution for joint 3D super-resolution estimation of range, azimuth, and elevation angles to locate a transmitting user, using a 5G system with grid antenna arrays. The proposed approach leverages the 3D multiple signal classification (MUSIC) algorithm to accurately localize targets from a single temporal snapshot by smoothing the frequency-spatial covariance matrix. A significant contribution of this work is addressing the challenge of unknown time-of-departure, which complicates time-of-flight calculations. Our solution introduces two grid antenna arrays to mitigate this uncertainty, enabling precise localization even without perfect synchronization between the transmitter and receiver. Extensive simulations confirm the robustness and high accuracy of our method, demonstrating its strong potential for complex IoT applications in demanding industrial environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207