CoDiPhy: A General Framework for Applying Denoising Diffusion Models to the Physical Layer of Wireless Communication Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generative models, including denoising diffusion models (DM), are gaining attention in wireless applications due to their ability to learn complex data distributions. In this paper, we propose CoDiPhy, a novel framework that leverages conditional denoising diffusion models to address a wide range of wireless physical layer problems. A key challenge of using DM is the need to assume or approximate Gaussian signal models. CoDiPhy addresses this by incorporating a conditional encoder as a guidance mechanism, mapping problem observations to a latent space and removing the Gaussian constraint. By combining conditional encoding, time embedding layers, and a U-Net-Based main neural network, CoDiPhy introduces a noise prediction neural network, replacing the conventional approach used in DM. This adaptation enables CoDiPhy to serve as an effective solution for a wide range of detection, estimation, and predistortion tasks. We demonstrate CoDiPhy’s adaptability through two case studies: an OFDM receiver for detection and phase noise compensation for estimation. In both cases, CoDiPhy outperforms conventional methods by a significant margin. <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".