Real-Time Phishing Detection for Brand Protection Using Temporal Convolutional Network-Driven URL Sequence Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phishing, especially brand impersonation attacks, is a critical cybersecurity threat that harms user trust and organization security. This paper establishes a lightweight model for real-time detection that relies on URL-only sequences, addressing limitations for multimodal methods that leverage HTML, images, or metadata. This approach is based on a Temporal Convolutional Network with Attention (TCNWithAttention) that utilizes character-level URLs to capture both local and long-range dependencies, while providing interpretability with attention visualization and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The model was trained and tested on the balanced GramBeddings dataset (800,000 URLs) and validated on the PhiUSIIL dataset of real-world phishing URLs. The model achieved 97.54% accuracy on the GramBeddings dataset, and 81% recall on the PhiUSIIL dataset. The model demonstrated strong generalization, fast inference, and CPU-only deployability. It outperformed CNN, BiLSTM and BERT baselines. Explanations highlighted phishing indicators, such as deceptive subdomains, brand impersonation, and suspicious tokens. It also affirmed real patterns in the legitimate domains. To our knowledge, a Streamlit application to facilitate single and batch URL analysis and log feedback to maintain usability is the first phishing detection framework to integrate TCN, attention, and SHAP, bridging academic innovation with practical cybersecurity techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".