MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414406932 · doi:10.1177/20552076251380324

Using the behaviour change wheel framework to develop a rule-based chatbot to support varenicline adherence for smoking cessation

2025· article· en· W4414406932 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadia Minian, Kamna Mehra, Jonathan Rose, Scott Veldhuizen, Laurie Zawertailo, Matt Ratto, Ryan Ting‐A‐Kee, Osnat C. Melamed, Victor M. Tang, Peter Selby

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoSchwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChatbotBehaviour changeVareniclineSmoking cessationBehavior change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Varenicline is one of the most effective smoking cessation medications; however, non-adherence remains a significant barrier to successful quitting. Conversational agents have the potential to support medication adherence in home and community settings. However, generative AI models pose risks due to hallucinations, making them less reliable for this purpose. Rule-based chatbots provide a more transparent, theory-driven approach to patient support. Thus, we developed ChatV, a rule based chatbot grounded in the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, to enhance varenicline adherence. Methods: ChatV was developed using a three-step process. First, we identified core determinants of varenicline adherence through a rapid review and qualitative interviews with healthcare providers and patients using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Second, we identified the intervention options through group discussions. Third, we identified intervention components using Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) Taxonomy v1. We applied the Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Safety, and Equity (APEASE) criteria to determine the final intervention components. Results: We identified 11 key domains relevant to behaviour change, including knowledge, beliefs about capabilities and consequences, memory, attention and decision-making processes, reinforcement, intentions, goals, social influences, environmental context and resources, behaviour regulation, and skill. Applying the APEASE criteria, we refined these to nine theoretical domains and identified 21 BCTs as core components of ChatV. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a structured, theory-informed approach to chatbot development for medication adherence. By integrating evidence-based behaviour change principles with practical considerations, ChatV offers a model for designing rule-based conversational agents in healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital HealthSame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207