Evidence for Dietary Management of Histamine Intolerance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self-reported food intolerances are estimated to affect between 15-20% of the population. Among them, histamine intolerance (HIT) has emerged as a focus of particular interest. It is defined as a disequilibrium between dietary histamine and the capacity of the organism to degrade intestinal histamine, leading to the appearance of intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. HIT is thought to be associated with low activity or blockade of diamine oxidase (DAO), the main enzyme for histamine degradation. The diagnosis is hampered by the lack of a validated biomarker and is mainly based on clinical assessment and response to a low histamine diet and reintroduction. The therapeutic approach is centered on dietary management, restricting foods that may increase circulating histamine levels. DAO supplementation has been shown to potentially contribute to histamine degradation in the intestinal lumen, but its activity varies depending on the presence of cofactors and the enzyme's origin. Limited clinical evidence reflects the difficulty of dietary management and suggests a beneficial role of DAO supplementation on the clinical manifestations associated with HIT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".