MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414416008 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105925

α-Synuclein seed amplification assay positivity beyond synucleinopathies

2025· article· en· W4414416008 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Martinez-Valbuena, Sarah Fullam, Seán O’Dowd, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Gábor G. Kovács

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
FundersMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsSynucleinopathiesDiseaseCorticobasal degenerationProtein foldingCerebrospinal fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurodegenerative diseases are increasingly recognized as complex disorders involving multiple protein pathologies, with α-synuclein frequently observed beyond classical synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Recent advances in seed amplification assays (SAAs) have enabled the highly sensitive and specific detection of misfolded α-synuclein in vivo, particularly in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This review focuses on CSF-based α-synuclein SAAs and their application in detecting co-pathology across non-synucleinopathies, including Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, and traumatic brain injury. Evidence indicates a role for α-synuclein in clinical heterogeneity and disease progression. Emerging diagnostic frameworks increasingly support integrating co-pathologies into classification and therapeutic strategies. Addressing key knowledge gaps, such as α-synuclein interactions with other protein pathologies, and current limitations of α-syn SAA, such as the lack of quantification of misfolded α-synuclein seeds, will refine precision medicine and improve outcomes for patients with neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207