MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414419995 · doi:10.1186/s13717-025-00646-5

Ecosystem engineering of tundra heath by Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) is driven by nutrient additions

2025· article· en· W4414419995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Processes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaChurchill Northern Studies CentreParks Canada
KeywordsTundraEcosystemEcological engineeringArcticNutrientArctic fox

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Soil nutrient availability is a limiting factor for tundra productivity. Therefore, consumer-driven alteration of nutrient availability can have a large effect on tundra communities. Previous work has demonstrated that Arctic foxes ( Vulpes lagopus ) act as ecosystem engineers in tundra heath communities by altering plant composition and increasing plant biomass on their dens, which then increases snow depth. To test the ability of increased nutrients and deeper snow to cause the ecosystem effects observed on fox dens, we set up a nutrient addition and snow fencing experiment on tundra heath in Wapusk National Park, Canada. Results Changes in experimental plots were mainly driven by fertilizer application, not snow depth. After 2 years, the fertilizer plots were invaded by a dune grass ( Elymus mollis ), which increased to 12% cover by the end of the experiment, which is typical of fox dens. After 4 years, total plant cover was 26% higher on the fertilizer plots than on the control plots. After 7 years of treatments, the plots receiving both fertilizer and snow fencing had the greatest shift in plant species composition, although they still lacked the tall willow shrubs typical of fox dens. Fertilized plots and dens had five times more arthropods than control plots. Most wildlife, except caribou ( Rangifer tarandus ), spent more time on fertilized plots in years when they were abundant, with Canada geese ( Branta canadensis ) being present 20 times longer in fertilizer plots. Collared lemmings ( Dicrostonyx richardsoni ) also preferred fertilized plots in the summer, but winter use was more pronounced on snow fenced and fertilized plots, where they produced 20 latrines per plot in a peak population year. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the nutrient limitation in tundra vegetation makes tundra ecosystems vulnerable to changes in nutrient availability, with changes in plant abundance and composition leading to increased animal activity, that has the potential to create a positive feedback in ecosystem productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it