Development and validation of age-specific predictive models on the risk of post-acute mortality within 1 year of COVID-19 infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The existing risk prediction models for COVID-19 associated mortality have not considered the differences in risk factors across different age groups of patients. AIM: To develop age-specific prediction models to forecast the risk of all-cause mortality in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with COVID-19 between 1 April 2020 and 31 July 2022 survived beyond the acute phase of infection were stratified into separate age cohorts (<45, 45-64, ≥65) and followed-up for 1 year. Backward stepwise logistic regression and four statistical and machine learning algorithms were employed to develop age-specific models on the risk of post-acute mortality following COVID-19 infection, based on a comprehensive set of clinical parameters including demographics, COVID-19 vaccination status, pre-existing comorbidities and laboratory-test findings. RESULTS: Of the 891 246 patients with COVID-19 identified, 13 578 (1.05%) died within 1 year of the index date. Age, COVID-19 vaccination status and history of acute respiratory syndrome prior infection were identified as predictors in the models for separate age groups. The model for patients aged ≥65 exhibited excellent prediction performance with an AUROC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.88), followed by the model for patients aged 45-64 [AUROC = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85)] and those aged <45 [AUROC = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.86)]. CONCLUSION: The age-specific models accurately predicted the risk of post-acute mortality in their corresponding age groups of patients, providing valuable asset in optimizing clinical strategies and resource allocation in the management of the global burden of Long COVID.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".