MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414427559 · doi:10.1115/1.4069925

Personalized Biomechanical Modeling of Pathologic Fracture: CTFEA Reveals Limitations of Traditional Fracture Risk Assessment in Benign Bone Tumors

2025· article· en· W4414427559 on OpenAlexafffund
Carla Winsor, Elise Laende, Jereme Outerleys, John F. Rudan, Daniel Borschneck, Heidi‐Lynn Ploeg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalKingston Health Sciences CentreUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPathologic fractureRisk stratificationOrthopedic surgeryStress fracturesRisk assessmentBiomechanicsFracture (geology)Computed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benign bone tumors such as chondroblastoma, giant cell tumors (GCT), and aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) are rare but clinically significant lesions that frequently occur in the epiphyseal regions of long bones, particularly near load-bearing joints in children and young adults. These tumors compromise the structural integrity of bone, leading to an elevated risk of pathologic fracture. Traditional methods for estimating fracture risk rely on simple geometric thresholds and volumetric ratios, but they fail to account for patient-specific differences in bone geometry, material heterogeneity, and physiological loading conditions. As a result, risk is often misclassified, which may lead to either overtreatment or missed prevention opportunities. To address this limitation, this study presents a preliminary demonstration of computed tomography-based finite element analysis (CTFEA) as a novel alternative method (NAM); computational framework using patient-specific CTFEA to evaluate fracture risk in four patients with benign knee tumors. Clinical computed tomography (CT) imaging and motion capture-informed joint loading were used to develop anatomically accurate, mechanically calibrated models incorporating nonlinear bone behavior. CTFEA simulations focused on walking, jogging, and partial weight-bearing conditions, captured localized stress and strain distributions, and were benchmarked against clinical and volumetric assessment criteria. CTFEA outperformed traditional methods by revealing mechanical vulnerabilities, including in cases classified as low-risk clinically, through its ability to simulate individualized loading scenarios. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and potential of CTFEA as a noninvasive, patient-specific alternative to animal or oversimplified models, with direct implications for preoperative planning and fracture risk stratification in orthopedic surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomechanical EngineeringSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207