MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414431389 · doi:10.22329/uwdj.v1i1.8318

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Post-Secondary Science Classrooms 

2023· article· en· W4414431389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUWill Discover Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Teaching methodQualitative researchHigher educationActive learning (machine learning)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As students enter post-secondary school and begin their program of choice, they will encounter individuals that have different backgrounds, views, cultures, and socio-economic statuses. Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) are important aspects to consider within the classroom as each student is unique. This study intends to provide insight into the thoughts instructors and students have about EDI within the classroom, such as teaching materials, assessments, and pedagogy/instruction. As a method of data collection, semi-structured interviews will be conducted, transcribed, and categorized into themes to be analyzed. Since many instructors are moving away from the traditional methods of lecturing and into a more active learning environment, the relationship between students, their peers, and instructors becomes more prevalent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.030
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it