MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414432013 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3611310

Next-Generation Intelligent Prediction Model for Real-Time Soil Nutrients’ Monitoring in Sustainable Farming

2025· article· en· W4414432013 on OpenAlexaff
Simanta Das, Tapan Maity, Ashok Mondal, Jagannath Samanta, Prabir Saha, Shubhankar Majumdar, Gautam Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil fertilityNutrientMean squared errorLinear regressionCrop yieldCoefficient of determinationAgricultureFertilizer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil nutrient content (SNC) is a key factor in plant development, and low soil fertility leads to an uneven distribution of essential nutrients such as Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Potassium (K). Hence, developing a nutrient predictive model has become an important area of research. Proper nutrient supplementation is essential to enhance crop yield and improve product quality. This paper proposes a model to estimate Soil Nutrient Content (SNC) using Gradient Descent Algorithm-based Multiple Linear Regression (GDA-MLR) algorithm. The model’s performance is evaluated for predicting SNC in agricultural fields. Additionally, Pearson’s correlation analysis is used to examine the relationship between SNC and factors such as moisture percentage (Mp), pH, and other soil nutrients, aiding in feature selection for the model. Model performance is evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Coefficient of Determination (R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Ratio of Prediction to Deviation (RPD). The proposed GDA-MLR model achieved an R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 99.97% with urea fertilizer (Nitrogen) application, indicating excellent predictive accuracy. Its low RMSE and high R<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> demonstrate superior performance compared to existing models. This makes the model well-suited for both precision and sustainable farming, promoting efficient and eco-friendly agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207