MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414434378 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32100528

Long-Term Risk of Pancreatic Cancer After Acute Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Insecticide Exposure: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4414434378 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeong Mi Moon, Eujene Jung, Byeongjo Chun, Dong Ki Kim, Yeonji Seong

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancreatic cancerProportional hazards modelHazard ratioCohort studyIncidence (geometry)Case-control studyCohortCancerCumulative incidence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This nationwide cohort study investigated whether a single episode of acute exposure to high-dose acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor insecticide is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service were analyzed. The case group (n = 938) included adults exposed to organophosphate or carbamate insecticide and the control group (n = 3752) was matched by age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank tests evaluated differences in pancreatic cancer incidence. Over 33,219.8 person-years of follow-up, pancreatic cancer developed in 9 patients in the case group and 19 patients in the control group. The cumulative incidence of pancreatic cancer was significantly higher in the case group (log-rank p < 0.01). Acute high-dose exposure to AChE inhibitor insecticide was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (adjusted HR: 2.57). The risk was particularly elevated among women (HR: 5.85) and individuals with diabetes (HR: 2.75). Acute high-dose exposure to AChE inhibitor insecticide may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. Women and those with diabetes may represent high-risk subgroups. These findings highlight the need for targeted cancer surveillance and further confirmatory studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→