MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414434422 · doi:10.1101/gr.280510.125

Long-read reconstruction of many diverse haplotypes with devider

2025· article· en· W4414434422 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jim Shaw, Christina Boucher, Yun William Yu, Noelle Noyes, Heng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Biological InfrastructureNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHaplotypeMetagenomicsAlleleDNA sequencingGenomicsDe Bruijn graphDeep sequencingNanopore sequencingCoalescent theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconstructing exact haplotypes is important when sequencing a mixture of similar sequences. Long-read sequencing can connect distant alleles to disentangle similar haplotypes, but handling sequencing errors requires specialized techniques. Here, we present devider , an algorithm for haplotyping small sequences, such as viruses or genes, from long-read sequencing. devider uses a positional de Bruijn graph with sequence-to-graph alignment on an alphabet of informative alleles to provide a fast assembly-inspired approach compatible with various long-read sequencing technologies. On a synthetic Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read data set containing seven HIV strains, devider recovers 97% of the haplotype content and has the most accurate abundance estimates while taking <4 min and 1 GB of memory for >8000× coverage. Benchmarking on synthetic mixtures of antimicrobial-resistance (AMR) genes shows that devider recovers 83% of haplotypes, 23 percentage points higher than the next best method. On real Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and ONT data sets, devider recapitulates previously known results in seconds, disentangling a bacterial community with more than 10 strains and an HIV-1 coinfection data set. We use devider to investigate the within-host diversity of a long-read bovine gut metagenome enriched for AMR genes, discovering 13 distinct haplotypes for a tet(Q) tetracycline-resistance gene with >18,000× coverage and six haplotypes for a CfxA2 beta-lactamase gene. We find clear recombination blocks for these AMR gene haplotypes, showcasing devider's ability to unveil evolutionary signals for heterogeneous mixtures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome ResearchSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207