MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414439780 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101096

CIRCULATING LIPID LEVELS AND WHOLE HEART ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE VOLUME ON CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY

2025· article· en· W4414439780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronary artery diseaseCholesterolCoronary atherosclerosisApolipoprotein BCoronary heart diseaseCoronary angiographyAngiographyClinical significanceLipoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with coronary artery disease (CAD) representing a major contributor. Despite circulating lipid biomarkers being widely utilized to prognosticate on the presence and severity of underlying CAD, the extent to which traditional lipid metrics correlate with coronary plaque volume remains unclear. Herein, we sought to assess the relationship between circulating lipid levels and whole heart coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume by leveraging artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (AIQCT) in statin-naïve general cardiology clinic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) due to suspected CAD. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 271 statin-naïve patients recruited from a single-center, general cardiology clinic undergoing AI-QCT for suspected CAD. Circulating lipid levels (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and apolipoprotein B [apoB]) were measured within one month of CCTA. AI-QCT was utilized to quantify total, calcified, and non-calcified plaque volumes (TPV, CPV, NCPV), as well as high-risk plaque features (remodeling index and low-attenuation plaque percent). The number of participants in each TPV category (<250, 250-750, >750 mm3) across lipid level tertiles was calculated, and the significance of between-tertile differences was assessed with Fisher’s exact test. Associations between continuous lipid levels and continuous AI-QCT features were evaluated using Spearman correlation. No significant difference was observed in clinical coronary TPV categories across TC (P=0.31), LDL-C (P=0.21), Lp(a) (P=0.57), or apoB (P=0.26) level tertiles. A significant difference in the distribution of coronary TPV categories was observed across HDL-C tertiles (P=0.034). No significant correlations were observed between continuous TC, LDL-C, or Lp(a) levels and continuous measures of coronary plaque volume or high-risk plaque features. ApoB levels were significantly, albeit weakly, positively correlated with NCPV (ρ=0.15, P=0.032), and HDL-C levels were weakly negatively correlated with TPV (ρ=-0.12, P=0.042) and NCPV (ρ=-0.16, P=0.008). Traditional lipid biomarkers may not reliably reflect coronary atherosclerotic burden in statin-naïve individuals. These findings highlight the potential value of integrating AI-QCT-based measures of coronary plaque volume to improve patient-specific diagnosis of CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it