MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414439782 · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101117

THE EFFECT OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE AIDS ON HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES IN PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIGH LEVELS OF CHRONIC AIR POLLUTION: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY

2025· article· en· W4414439782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossover studyBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusRandomized controlled trialAir purifierType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CVD Prevention – Primary and Secondary Air pollution is a leading cause of cardiometabolic diseases, especially in the Global South. Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been linked to an increased risk of hypertension (HTN) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Controlled studies show indoor air purifiers and N95 masks lower blood pressure and plasma glucose over short periods, but their real-world effectiveness is unclear. This study evaluates their impact on Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) with routine use. A prospective, randomized crossover study was conducted in Dalkhola, India, a region with high ambient PM2.5 levels. Seventy-two participants with HTN and/or T2DM were recruited. The intervention included using an indoor air purifier at night and a N95 mask outdoors, while the control group used identical devices with sham filtration. Participants and assessors were blinded to study assignment, and primary outcomes assessed were changes in SBP and FBG (Figure 1). Pre-study controlled testing of the indoor air purifier demonstrated a 67% reduction in PM2.5 levels but real-world use showed no significant difference between groups. SBP decreased by 4.6 ± 11.9 mmHg in the control period and remained unchanged in the intervention period (0 ± 12.0 mmHg; difference: 4.6 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.9 to 8.9, p = 0.02). FBG decreased by 8.3 ± 23.5 mg/dL (control) vs. 2.2 ± 28.5 mg/dL (intervention; difference: 6.2 mg/dL, 95% CI: -4.7 to 17.2, p = 0.26). Focus group discussions revealed that participants opened windows at night due to heat in summer, turned off purifiers due to cold in winter or noise, and limited use over electricity cost concerns. Routine use of indoor air purifiers and N95 masks did not significantly reduce indoor PM2.5 levels or improve SBP and FBG in an area of high ambient air pollution. Unlike regulated conditions, routine use is often suboptimal due to environmental, behavioral and economic factors, making air purifiers unlikely to improve cardiometabolic health in chronically polluted regions of the global south.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it