Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A glove box is a controlled environment used for a wide range of scientific experiments. While glove boxes provide significant advantages, their high economic costs ranging from over $1,000 to over $15,000 limits their accessibility in under-resourced labs. There are lower-cost DIY designs available on the internet, but they have not been well characterized nor validated. To overcome these limitations, in this study, an open source glove box design is developed for scientific applications using readily available components and digital distributed manufacturing using open-source RepRap-class 3D printers. The ability of the glove box to hold an inert atmosphere is quantified using an oxygen analyzer. The open source glove box can be customized to the dimensions of the user and the volume of the experiment. The design also enables the use of customizable transfer chambers that can be adjusted based on the scientific application. The open source glove box is built from a low-cost enclosure while preventing contamination. The highly portable device can reduce oxygen down to 19 ppm using an inert gas. The economic savings of the validated device compared to proprietary systems is over 95 %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it