MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414441416 · doi:10.1107/s2056989025008151

<i>catena</i> -Poly[[(5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine)nickel(II)]-μ <sub>2</sub> -azido-κ <sup>2</sup> <i>N</i> : <i>N</i> -μ <sub>2</sub> -azido-κ <sup>2</sup> <i>N</i> : <i>N</i> ′]: synthesis, crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT calculations

2025· article· en· W4414441416 on OpenAlexaff
Zouaoui Setifi, Fatima Setifi, David K. Geiger, Thierry Maris, Loai Aljerf, Christopher Glidewell

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersDirection Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
KeywordsPolymerRing (chemistry)Hydrogen bondCrystal structureSurface (topology)Crystal (programming language)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title compound, [Ni(N 3 ) 2 (C 12 H 12 N 2 )] n , was synthesized solvothermally and characterized crystallographically. The compound forms a one-dimensional coordination polymer containing alternating spiro-fused four- and eight-membered rings, in which both ring types are centrosymmetric. Adjacent polymer chains are linked into sheets by means of a single C—H...N hydrogen bond. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to investigate the intermolecular interactions. DFT calculations were used to explore the conformation of the bridging azides and to compare the stability of this compound with those previously reported [Setifi et al. (2022). Acta Cryst . C 78 , 449–454].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.017
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207