Phage display screening for highly specific nickel- and cobalt-binding peptides for bio-recovery of metals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electronic waste is a valuable source of critical metals like nickel and cobalt, but their recovery is challenging. Current recycling processes use harsh conditions and toxic chemicals, which is why environmentally friendly alternatives are crucial. Metal-binding peptides offer high selectivity and durability, making them promising for sustainable metal separation. Here, phage display was successfully applied to screen a combinatorial peptide library with specific affinities to nickel or cobalt. Identified peptides with the amino acid sequences FWPLHHH, GPHKHHA, HNYHHRH, and HMNHHHH revealed improved binding affinities of up to 20.000-fold to immobilized metal ions compared to the unspecific binding of the phage backbone. Furthermore, low micromolar dissociation constants e.g., 6.2 µM for peptide Co_02 (HMNHHHH) to Co 2+ and 29.0 µM for peptide Ni_01 (GPHKHHA) to Ni 2+ , determined by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) measurements confirmed the intrinsic metal binding properties. These peptides offer a high potential for future recycling of nickel and cobalt from mixed metal waste like batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it