MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414447876 · doi:10.1101/2025.09.22.677733

Oral 4’-fluorouridine completely suppresses epidemic Oropouche virus replication in mice and confers protection against virus-induced disease

2025· preprint· en· W4414447876 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Ferrié, Maïlis Darmuzey, Thibault Tubiana, Mona Khan, Tania Roskams, Birgit Weynand, Niels Cremers, Stijn Hendrickx, Kim Donckers, Thayara Morais Portal, Bert Vanmechelen, Joana Rocha‐Pereira, Concetta Castilletti, Peter Mombaerts, Stéphane Bressanelli, Manon Laporte, Johan Neyts

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
FundersKU Leuven
KeywordsOrthobunyavirusViral replicationOutbreakVirusDiseaseRNAPolymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Oropouche virus (OROV) is an orthobunyavirus that causes increasingly frequent and severe outbreaks in Central and South America. We report that 4′-fluorouridine (4′-FlU) inhibits the in vitro replication of epidemic and pre-epidemic OROV strains in multiple cell lines. In vitro polymerase assays demonstrate that 4’-FlU (as its triphosphate) targets the Peribunyaviridae L protein, is incorporated during RNA synthesis and causes premature chain termination. Following 69 consecutive days of in vitro passages of OROV in the presence of suboptimal concentrations of 4’-FlU, no drug-resistant variants were identified in the viral polymerase. In stringent mouse (AG129) or Syrian hamster OROV-infection models, oral administration of 4′-FlU completely blocked viral replication and virus-induced disease, even when administration was delayed until 72 hours after infection. Our findings support exploring the potential of 4’-FlU for the management of OROV infections in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207