Exploring the impact of social relevance on the cortical tracking of speech: viability and temporal response characterisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Human speech is inherently social. Yet our understanding of the neural substrates underlying continuous speech perception relies largely on neural responses to monologues, leaving substantial uncertainty about how social interactions shape the neural encoding of speech. Here, we bridge this gap by studying how EEG responses to speech change when the input includes a social element. In Experiment 1, we compared the neural encoding of synthesised undirected monologues, directed monologues, and dialogues. In Experiment 2, we extended this by using podcasts, addressing the additional challenges of real speech dialogue, such as dysfluency. Using temporal response function analyses, we show that the presence of a social component strengthens the cortical tracking of the speech envelope, despite identical acoustic properties. Neural responses to synthesised speech showed a strong correlation with those for real speech podcasts, with a stronger alignment emerging for more socially-relevant speech material. In addition, we demonstrate that robust neural indices of sound and lexical-level processing can be derived using real podcast recordings despite the presence of dysfluencies. Finally, we present a simulation to put to the test the robustness of temporal response function analyses under increasing levels of dysfluency. Together, these findings highlighting the impact of social elements in shaping auditory neural processing, providing a framework for future investigation and analysis of social speech listening and speech interaction. Significance Statement Human speech is rarely produced or processed in a social vacuum. Yet, our understanding of continuous speech neurophysiology mostly comes from experiments involving speech monologues. This study reveals how social context modulates the neural encoding of speech. We directly contrast neural signals recorded when participants listened to monologues and dialogues, using controlled material from speech synthesis and real podcast recordings. We found that the social element amplifies the neural encoding of speech features, reflecting greater engagement. We also show strong correlation between synthetic and real podcast neural responses, scaling with social relevance. Finally, we demonstrate that lexical processing can be measured robustly even amid natural dysfluencies. These insights advance our understanding of speech neurophysiology, informing future research on social speech.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".