Leveraging Multi-View Images to Learn Domain-Invariant Discriminative Embeddings for Cross-View Geo-Localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) aims to match images of the same location captured from different viewpoints, such as those captured by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and satellite platforms. The task is particularly challenging due to significant variations in scale, viewpoint, and illumination. Most existing methods employ symmetric sampling strategy to construct drone–satellite image pairs for deep metric learning, but neglect the potential of incorporating multi-view drone images to enhance the viewpoint robustness of features. To address this, we propose leveraging multi-view images to learn Domain-Invariant Discriminative Embeddings (DIDE) for CVGL. DIDE introduces an Inter-view Feature Aggregation Module (IFAM), which dynamically integrates multi-view drone information into robust embeddings. These are used in contrastive learning with satellite embeddings within batches to learn view-invariant discriminative features, while representation learning further improves scene discrimination across batches. To reduce the domain gap, DIDE constructs and aligns drone and satellite prototypes for effective cross-domain feature alignment. Furthermore, we adopt a parameter-efficient transfer learning strategy that leverages the capabilities of pre-trained foundation models while fine-tuning only dual adapters, significantly reducing the trainable parameters. DIDE achieves the state-of-the-art on University-1652 and University-160k, competitive results on SUES-200, and demonstrates strong cross-dataset transferability, with fewer training parameters and lower computational cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".