MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414458632 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2025.3613262

Leveraging Multi-View Images to Learn Domain-Invariant Discriminative Embeddings for Cross-View Geo-Localization

2025· article· en· W4414458632 on OpenAlexaff
Ziyi Chen, Dilong Li, Jin Gou, Cheng Wang, Kyle Gao, Jonathan Li, Zheng Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiscriminative modelRobustness (evolution)DroneFeature learningFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Task analysisFeature (linguistics)Task (project management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-view geo-localization (CVGL) aims to match images of the same location captured from different viewpoints, such as those captured by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and satellite platforms. The task is particularly challenging due to significant variations in scale, viewpoint, and illumination. Most existing methods employ symmetric sampling strategy to construct drone–satellite image pairs for deep metric learning, but neglect the potential of incorporating multi-view drone images to enhance the viewpoint robustness of features. To address this, we propose leveraging multi-view images to learn Domain-Invariant Discriminative Embeddings (DIDE) for CVGL. DIDE introduces an Inter-view Feature Aggregation Module (IFAM), which dynamically integrates multi-view drone information into robust embeddings. These are used in contrastive learning with satellite embeddings within batches to learn view-invariant discriminative features, while representation learning further improves scene discrimination across batches. To reduce the domain gap, DIDE constructs and aligns drone and satellite prototypes for effective cross-domain feature alignment. Furthermore, we adopt a parameter-efficient transfer learning strategy that leverages the capabilities of pre-trained foundation models while fine-tuning only dual adapters, significantly reducing the trainable parameters. DIDE achieves the state-of-the-art on University-1652 and University-160k, competitive results on SUES-200, and demonstrates strong cross-dataset transferability, with fewer training parameters and lower computational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningFrench-language works237,207