MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414458709 · doi:10.1109/tec.2025.3614170

Equivalent Circuit Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Considering Multi-Physics Transients in EMTP-Type Simulators

2025· article· en· W4414458709 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Xia, Zhaoran Wang, Shaahin Filizadeh, Juan Su, Ruikai Song, Kai Strunz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)EmtpEquivalent circuitFlexibility (engineering)Electric power systemThermalElectric powerPower (physics)Proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP) is widely used for simulating electromagnetic transients in power systems. In recent years, applications of electrolyzers in electric power systems have attracted considerable attention because electrolyzers are among the most promising energy-conversion devices for realizing hydrogen production from renewable energy sources while enhancing system flexibility by functioning as controllable loads. With the growing interest in electrolyzers, it would be advantageous to broaden the application of EMTP to include multi-physics transients such as those observed in electrolyzers. This article details the implementation of such an extension for a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEMEL). Analogies between electric, mass transfer, and thermal quantities are adopted to develop an electric circuit model that describes currents, voltages, mass transfer, pressure, heat transfer, and temperature. The PEMEL model considering the interactions of electric, mass transfer, and thermal transients can be readily implemented in EMTP-type programs using existing components from standard libraries. The proposed electric circuit model was validated through comparison with experimental data under both steady-state and transient conditions. The value of the proposed model was illustrated via application to a PEMELbased integrated electrical and gas system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207