MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414462438 · doi:10.1038/s41612-025-01188-5

Worldwide inventory reveals the frequency and variability of pyrocumulonimbus and stratospheric smoke plumes during 2013–2023

2025· article· en· W4414462438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David A. Peterson, Melinda T. Berman, Michael Fromm, R. Servranckx, William J. Julstrom, E. J. Hyer, James R. Campbell, Theodore M. McHardy, Andrew Lambert

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Climate and Atmospheric Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryOffice of Naval ResearchNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationIowa Space Grant ConsortiumNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsSmokeAerosolTropopauseStratosphereRadiative forcingRange (aeronautics)PlumeAtmosphere (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An inventory of 761 confirmed pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb) events observed worldwide during 2013-2023 answers many open questions on the inter-annual, seasonal, sub-daily, and regional variability of this hazardous fire weather phenomenon, along with potential controlling factors. It reveals that the 2023 fire season set new records for total pyroCb activity regionally (142 events in Canada alone) and worldwide (169 events). Smoke injection altitudes range from the mid-troposphere to the lower stratosphere (8–18 km), with 414 pyroCb events (55%) linked to smoke injection within 1 km of the tropopause or higher. Estimated aerosol mass in these plumes spans four orders of magnitude, which has significant implications for climate-scale radiative effects and ozone chemistry. The cumulative aerosol particle mass injected near the tropopause over an active fire season can rival that of recent extreme pyroCb events and significant volcanic eruptions. This pyroCb inventory is critical for advancing fire weather prediction capabilities to aid firefighting efforts and improving smoke transport forecasts. It sets a foundation for an Earth System Data Record that can be used to identify longer-term trends in pyroCb activity and consequent impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207